Elsevier

Journal of Equine Veterinary Science

Volume 34, Issues 11–12, November–December 2014, Pages 1294-1299
Journal of Equine Veterinary Science

Original Research
Application of a Full Body Inertial Measurement System in Dressage Riding

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2014.09.009Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Application of a full-body inertial measurement in horseback riding under field conditions

  • The two-beat rhythm of the sitting trot was qualitatively represented in the waveform data of the head, trunk, and pelvis about the rotation of the mediolateral axes

  • The movements of the riders' segments about the sagittal axes show smaller values than about the mediolateral axes

  • The coefficient of multiple correlation values indicate a very good intertrial repeatability

Abstract

With the steady further development of microelectromechanical systems, nowadays, it is possible to measure various specific kinematics of riders with inertial sensors. The aim of the study was to quantify the rider's posture on the horse with a full-body inertial measurement system (Xsens MVN) under field conditions. Ten high-level riders from the German National Equestrian Federation participated in this study. The measurements were performed in sitting trot (ST) in an indoor riding hall. Kinematic data from the riders' segments (head, trunk, and pelvis) and joint angles (elbow and knee) were collected. Qualitative analyses of the waveform parameters and statistical analyses were applied to the data. In addition, the coefficient of multiple correlations (CMCs) was calculated between angle-time courses to quantify the waveform similarities and intertrial repeatability for each rider. All analyzed CMCs ranged from moderate (0.65) to very good (0.92). The two-beat rhythm of the ST was qualitatively represented in the waveform data of the head, trunk, and pelvis about the rotation of the mediolateral axes (Roll). The Roll of the riders' pelvis was significantly greater than the Roll of the riders' trunk. In general, the movements of the riders' segments about the sagittal axes (Pitch) show smaller values than about the mediolateral axes. In conclusion, this setup seems to be suitable to quantify riders' kinematics under certain field conditions. Based on these findings, there is a possibility to obtain several objective information of the riders' kinematics in different equine gaits and skill levels.

Introduction

A good performance in dressage riding is mainly based on a correct rider sitting position. In BC 365, Xenophon already dealt with the question how the rider should move on a horse. Xenophon describes an upright sitting position and emphasizes the importance of a well-balanced and elastic seat of the rider [1]. These rules are still acknowledged across all equestrian disciplines down to the present day.

In the guidelines of the German National Equestrian Federation (2012), the dressage seat is defined as balanced, elastic, and upright. The requirements of a good posture are described as a vertical line between the rider's shoulder-hip-heel and a central position of the rider [2], [3]. However, these theoretical considerations are difficult to grasp for researchers and horsemen [4]. It would be an improvement if more objective criteria could be developed. Biomechanical measurements could be beneficial in this matter.

At present, three-dimensional (3D) optical motion capture in gait laboratories (treadmill) is the gold standard method to quantify and analyze the rider's [5], [6] and horse's movements [7], [8], [9]. Recent treadmill studies of Byström et al [5], [6] and Peinen et al [10] present a comprehensive kinematic description of the rider's upper body, the saddle, and the horse trunk in walk and sitting trot (ST). However, there are differences between the locomotion of a horse on a treadmill and overground locomotion [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. In several studies, the posture, joint angles, and kinematics of riders were investigated with camera-based measurements [16], [17], [18], [19]. However, video-based measurement techniques show a number of disadvantages with respect to the application in horseback riding: a limited field of view, limitations concerning the acceleration measurements, and the expenditure of time and cost [20], [21], [22], [23].

The steady development of microelectromechanical systems and inertial measurement units (IMUs) results in decreasing costs, enhanced performance, and portability [24].

The application of full-body inertial measurement systems in human movement research is becoming increasingly practicable. There are a few studies in the usage of such systems in alpine sports [25], [26], [27], [28], clinical gait analysis [29], [30], [31], human movement research [32], [33], and other sport sciences [34], [35].

This new age of data capturing allows performance analyzes in horseback riding outside gait laboratories with a big sample size and high accuracy [22]. In recent years, there is a great interest in veterinary studies to collect the equine movement with IMUs [9], [36], [37], [38]. The investigations of Münz et al [39], [40] are one of the first who describe an inertial sensor-based method attached on rider's pelvis and horse's trunk. They found that the IMUs are suitable to collect the kinematics of human pelvis in the different equine gaits. Distinctions between the horse–rider interaction of professional riders and beginners have also been demonstrated with these methods. Wolframm et al [41] found characteristics of motor coordination between horse and rider in walk, trot, and canter based on two single triaxial wireless accelerometers. Investigations regarding the acceleration of head movement and muscular activity also point out differences depending on the gait and performance levels [42]. However, there are no publications available considering the rider's whole-body movement. It is hypothesized that a full-body kinematic analysis could contribute for a better understanding of the horse–rider interaction [20].

Hence, the aim of the current study was to evaluate the application and performance of a full-body inertial system in dressage riding and additionally to investigate the selected rider kinematics in ST.

Section snippets

Riders and Horses

Ten professional dressage riders (eight females and two males; mean age ± standard deviation, 23.4 ± 5.3 years) with a body mass index of 21.5 ± 2.5 kg/m2 and at least 17 years of experience participated in the study. All of them had worked as riding instructors at the German Federation Equestrian National (FN). The participants rode with their own dressage saddles and bits. The eight geldings and two mares (mean age ± SD: 7.9 ± 4.2 years; mean height ± SD at withers: 170 ± 3.5 cm) had been

Results

The mean velocity of ST was 4.4 ± 0.3 m/s2. Across 30 gait cycles, all analyzed CMCs ranged from moderate to very good (Table 1). The highest CMC value showed the acceleration of the rider's trunk. The smallest CMC was found for the Pitch of the rider's head. In general, the waveform similarity of Roll was greater than the Pitch values for rider's segments. Especially for the rider's pelvis, the intertrial repeatability was very good.

It was found that the ROM values of Roll are greater than the

Discussion

The application of a full-body inertial measurement system is capable of estimating the rider's segment kinematics with a CMC between moderate and very good waveform similarity. In particular, the CMC values for Roll of the rider's pelvis indicate a very good intertrial repeatability. Because of the fact that horseback riding is characterized by an active and elastic seat with a high part of individualism [47], no greater CMC values for high-level dressage riders could be found in contrast to

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the application of a full-body inertial measurement in horseback riding under field conditions. Previous studies under field conditions have a small sample size and limited in field of view. In treadmill studies, the rider's and horse's kinematics cannot be collected under realistic conditions. To the author's best knowledge to date, there is no research with a holistic approach in horseback riding.

We have shown that this setup is suitable to quantify specific kinematics

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Federal Institute of Sport Science (BISp) for the funding of this research.

References (54)

  • A.C. Mandal

    The seated man (Homo Sedens) the seated work position. Theory and practice

    Appl Ergon

    (1981)
  • A.B. Kotschwar et al.

    The influence of different saddle pads on force and pressure changes beneath saddles with excessively wide trees

    Vet J

    (2010)
  • C. Peham et al.

    A comparison of forces acting on the horse's back and the stability of the rider's seat in different positions at the trot

    Vet J

    (2010)
  • Xenophon

    Reitkunst, Neuaufl

    (2006)
  • C. Hess et al.
    (2012)
  • E. Meyners

    Bewegungsgefühl und Reitersitz. Reitfehler vermeiden—Sitzprobleme lösen

    (2005)
  • E. Hübener

    Die Bewegungen von Pferderumpf und -rücken aus der Sicht des Reiters

    Tierärztliche Rundschau: Organ für Praktische Tierärzte

    (2004)
  • A. Byström et al.

    Basic kinematics of the saddle and rider in high-level dressage horses trotting on a treadmill

    Equine Vet J

    (2009)
  • A. Byström et al.

    Kinematics of saddle and rider in high-level dressage horses performing collected walk on a treadmill

    Equine Vet J

    (2010)
  • M. Faber et al.

    Three-dimensional kinematics of the equine spine during canter

    Equine Vet J Suppl

    (2001)
  • M. Faber et al.

    Repeatability of back kinematics in horses during treadmill locomotion

    Equine Vet J

    (2002)
  • K.G. Keegan et al.

    Assessment of repeatability of a wireless, inertial sensor-based lameness evaluation system for horses

    Am J Vet Res

    (2011)
  • K. von Peinen et al.

    Relationship between the forces acting on the horse's back and the movements of rider and horse while walking on a treadmill

    Equine Vet J

    (2009)
  • E. Barrey et al.

    Stride characteristics of overground versus treadmill locomotion in the saddle horse

    Acta Anat (Basel)

    (1993)
  • E. Barrey et al.

    Lameness detection using an accelerometric device

    Pferdeheilkunde

    (1996)
  • P. Galloux et al.

    Components of the total kinetic moment in jumping horses

    Equine Vet J

    (1997)
  • H.H.F. Buchner et al.

    Habituation of horses to treadmill locomotion

    Equine Vet J

    (1994)
  • Cited by (32)

    • Managing the Rider

      2022, Veterinary Clinics of North America - Equine Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      Significant trunk rotation causes changes in the head and neck positions in an effort to maintain the rider’s vision directed forward in the direction of travel (see Fig. 3). In a kinematic study of elite riders, head movements were very small compared with the movements of other body segments.14 This suggests that muscular control of the head and neck is important.

    • Influence of Functional Rider and Horse Asymmetries on Saddle Force Distribution During Stance and in Sitting Trot

      2019, Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      In total, 20 IMUs (MTw Awinda Wireless Motion Tracker) were attached to horse and rider. During riding, the rider wore an MVN full-body sensor setup as described by Eckardt et al, except no IMUs were placed on the hands [10]. Riders were equipped by people trained to this setup.

    • Relationship Between Saddle and Rider Kinematics, Horse Locomotion, and Thoracolumbar Pressures in Sound Horses

      2018, Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Future studies should attempt to look at various riding positions and their influence on saddle position. The effect the rider has on the horse [3,42–44] and rider experience [1] have been investigated, in respect to saddle position; with saddle roll to the outside, the rider's seat was positioned to the outside (with the saddle), and in a likely attempt to maintain balance, by keeping their center of mass aligned as closely to the midline of the horse, the rider's trunk leant to the inside. All riders adjusted their position as a result of saddle position and when corrected they became more central.

    • Recognition of action dynamics in fencing using multimodal cues

      2018, Image and Vision Computing
      Citation Excerpt :

      Inertial measurement units (IMUs) are commonly used as well [19], since they provide high sampling frequency and permit analysis of movements, whose distinguishing may be difficult on the basis of color or depth data. IMUs are employed in disciplines such as golf [20], dressage riding [21] or swimming [5]. Fusion of data from multiple modalities is employed quite rarely, although some recent works in this area can be found [22,23].

    • Horse–Rider Interaction: A New Method Based on Inertial Measurement Units

      2017, Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      Rotations over the sagittal axis are called pitch. Further information about this data processing is described by Eckardt et al [28] and Eckardt and Witte [29]. Afterward, the cross-correlation function was used to find the time lag between the stride-separated kinematics of each horse–rider combination (each subject of the group of PRO and BEG) within the event of a stride (see in the previous sections) [35-37].

    • Rider impacts on equitation

      2017, Applied Animal Behaviour Science
      Citation Excerpt :

      However the methodology proved to be workable and repeatable suggesting further exploration of rider’s movements could be undertaken with inertial movement sensors. Eckardt et al. (2014), Gandy et al. (2014) and Lee and Kwak (2014) have used suits worn by the rider that contain multiple inertial motion sensors and the future for more detailed examination of the rider and their movement on the horse looks very promising. Asymmetry in the rider’s position is considered a negative trait (Hobbs et al., 2014) as a good position is needed to ensure clear communication from the rider to the horse via clear physical signals (Symes and Ellis, 2009).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text