Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
Volume 29, Issue 11 , Pages 795-798, November 2009

A Comparison Between Polymerase Chain Reaction and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Methods for Detecting Leptospira in Equine Recurrent Uveitis

  • Gholam Ali Kojouri, DVM, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Gholam Ali Kojouri, Department of Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Shahrekord University, PO Box 115, Shahrekord, Iran.
  • ,
  • Camellia Taghadosi, DVM

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Science, School of Veterinary Medicine, Shahrekord University, Shahrekord, Iran
  • ,
  • Hassan Momtaz, DVM, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Azad University of Shahrekord, Shahrekord, Iran
  • ,
  • Ehsan Taheri, DVM

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Azad University of Shahrekord, Shahrekord, Iran

Abstract 

Leptospirosis is a widespread zoonotic disease that affects humans and many species of animals. Leptospiral organisms have long been presumed to be associated with the presence of equine recurrent uveitis (ERU). The connection between ERU and leptospirosis can be established using various techniques. In the current study, we used a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay to help establish a diagnosis of ERU caused by Leptospira infection and compared the results with those of enzyme-linked immune assay (ELISA). A total of 31 and 30 serum samples were taken from horses with ERU (based on clinical diagnosis) and horses that were healthy, respectively, between June 2007 and December 2008. The results showed that from 31 affected horses, a total of seven and five samples were positive for leptospiral infection using PCR and ELISA, respectively, whereas there was no evidence of infection with Leptospira spp. in 30 serum samples of healthy horses. All of the positive samples in ELISA were also positive by PCR, whereas PCR detected two positive cases that were negative by ELISA. Although there was no significant difference between these two methods, it is apparent that PCR may be a more reliable tool for detecting the presence of leptospires in ERU.

Keywords: ELISA, Equine, Uveitis, Leptospirosis, PCR

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0737-0806(09)00650-9

doi:10.1016/j.jevs.2009.10.015

Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
Volume 29, Issue 11 , Pages 795-798, November 2009