Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
Volume 29, Issue 12 , Pages 823-827, December 2009

Equine Veterinarians' and Health Care Professionals' Concerns Related to the Implementation of the National Equine Identification System

  • K.S. Vanderman, BS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dairy and Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
  • ,
  • N.A. Dreschel, DVM, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dairy and Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
  • ,
  • A.M. Swinker, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dairy and Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Ann M. Swinker, Department of Dairy and Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, 324 W.L. Henning Building, University Park, PA 16802-3503.
  • ,
  • D.M. Kniffen, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dairy and Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
  • ,
  • R.B. Radhakrishna, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Agricultural and Extension Education, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
  • ,
  • J.R. Werner, VMD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dairy and Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania
  • ,
  • E.A. Jedrzejewski, DVM

      Affiliations

    • Department of Dairy and Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania

Abstract 

The National Animal Identification System (NAIS) is an animal tracking database created to contain the spread of contagious foreign animal diseases. Currently, no studies address the perceived support of the equine veterinary field for NAIS. The objectives of this study were to determine equine veterinarians' level of familiarity with NAIS, perceived effectiveness of NAIS, use of equine microchipping, and extent of disaster planning. A 26-question online survey (Zoomerang zPro, MarketTools, Inc., San Francisco, CA) was designed and administered to a sample (n = 139) drawn from the American Association of Equine Practitioners. SPSS 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) was used to analyze data. Results showed that only 19.4% of practicing veterinarians were “very familiar” with NAIS. Nearly half (49.3%) of the respondents were neutral regarding their opinion of NAIS. However, 55.6% thought that NAIS would efficiently stop the spread of a contagious animal disease. More than 52% reported that they were currently microchipping horses. After microchipping, 66.7% did not verify premises' identification numbers or record information about the horse, and 80.2% did not complete the paperwork to contact the State Department of Agriculture. Approximately 75.2% of respondents reported that they had experienced a contagious disease outbreak. Most (81.6%) veterinarian respondents did not have a plan to deal with clients' horses during a disaster. There is a need for communication and information for veterinarians regarding NAIS, premises registration, emergency planning guidelines, data to collect after microchipping, and how to provide information to clients.

Keywords: Equine, Identification, Veterinarian, NAIS, Microchip

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0737-0806(09)00648-0

doi:10.1016/j.jevs.2009.10.013

Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
Volume 29, Issue 12 , Pages 823-827, December 2009