Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
Volume 29, Issue 6 , Pages 540-546, June 2009

Prevalence of Gastric Ulcerations in Horses with Colic

  • Tara S. Rabuffo, DVM, ACVS

      Affiliations

    • Smoketown Veterinary Hospital, Smoketown, PA
  • ,
  • Eileen S. Hackett, DVM, MS, ACVS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Colorado State University, Ft Collins, CO
  • ,
  • Nora Grenager, VMD

      Affiliations

    • Steinbeck Country Equine Clinic, Salinas, CA
  • ,
  • Raymond Boston, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Studies, University of Pennsylvania, School of Veterinary Medicine, Kennett Square, PA
  • ,
  • James A. Orsini, DVM, ACVS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Clinical Studies, University of Pennsylvania, School of Veterinary Medicine, Kennett Square, PA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: James A. Orsini, DVM, ACVS, University of Pennsylvania, School of Veterinary Medicine, New Bolton Center, 382 West Street Road, Kennett Square, PA 19348.

Abstract 

The goal of this study was to determine the prevalence of gastric ulcers in horses with acute abdominal crisis (colic) and to examine the temporal effect of hospitalization on ulcer development in equine patients treated for colic. In addition, other factors that may be associated with gastric ulceration were also explored. The study design was a prospective original study incorporating 169 horses that presented to the George D. Widener Hospital for examination. One hundred and twelve horses presenting with the chief complaint of colic were included in the study group, and 57 horses that presented for non-colic or nonemergency complaints were evaluated and included as case controls. Gastroscopy was performed on equine patients presenting with the chief complaint of colic or horses presenting for reasons other than colic (control); mucosal changes were scored 0 to 3. Additionally, horses presenting for colic were gastroscopically evaluated twice during a 5-day period. Medical records were reviewed for history, clinical findings, laboratory results, and treatment. Seventy-six of 112 horses presenting with the chief complaint of colic had gastric ulceration compared with 41 of 57 horses in the control group. There was a significant association between age of the patient and chief complaint (ie, colic vs control) and between breed and chief complaint. There was no association between gastric ulcer score and chief complaint (colic vs control). Thirty-eight of the 112 horses presenting with colic deteriorated in ulcer score while hospitalized. Using a Pearson chi-squared test, there was no statistically significant association between gastric ulceration with age, breed, or sex. Horses with gastric ulceration in the colic group had lower packed cell volumes compared with horses presenting with colic without gastric ulcers, and this was statistically significant (P < .001). The high incidence of gastric ulceration in the study and control groups supports the reports of other investigators that gastric ulcers in horses, no matter the presenting complaint, are widespread. There was a significant association between breed and chief complaint (P = .005); however, breed and outcome of gastric ulceration were not related (Thoroughbreds were the least likely breed to present for colic). Although a trend in increasing gastric ulceration was seen in hospitalized colic patients, it was not statistically significant. This suggests that horses that are hospitalized may be at increased risk for developing gastric ulcers because of stress, feed deprivation, and administration of treatment. Thus, horses that present for colic should be gastroscopically evaluated if clinical signs raise the index of suspicion for gastric ulceration.

Keywords: Acute abdominal crisis, Colic, Gastric ulcers, Gastroscopy, EGUS

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0737-0806(09)00488-2

doi:10.1016/j.jevs.2009.05.005

Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
Volume 29, Issue 6 , Pages 540-546, June 2009