Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
Volume 26, Issue 7 , Pages 305-309, July 2006

Retention of liquid within insemination equipment using various equine frozen semen insemination methods and two semen freezing extenders

  • John J. Dascanio, VMD, Diplomate ACT, ABVP

      Affiliations

    • Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Center for Reproductive Excellence using Assisted Reproduction and Endocrinology (CREATE)
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: John J. Dascanio, Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Center for Reproductive Excellence using Assisted Reproduction and Endocrinology (CREATE), Duck Pond Drive, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061
  • ,
  • Ramanathan Kasimanickam, BVSc, DVSc, Diplomate ACT

      Affiliations

    • Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Center for Reproductive Excellence using Assisted Reproduction and Endocrinology (CREATE)
  • ,
  • Stephanie Milburn, BS

      Affiliations

    • Virginia-Maryland Regional College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Center for Reproductive Excellence using Assisted Reproduction and Endocrinology (CREATE)
  • ,
  • Andrea Canerossi, BS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA
  • ,
  • Rebecca Splan, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA

Abstract 

The objective of this study was to examine the effect of different insemination techniques and extenders on the volume of liquid dispensed from insemination equipment. The method of insemination has a significant effect on the volume of semen deposited into the mare's uterus when low volumes are used. Insemination pipettes that allow for direct deposit of straw contents into the uterus are preferred. Aspiration of semen into a pipette is preferred over aspiration into a syringe with deposition through a pipette when direct deposit is not possible. Use of a pipette with a smaller lumen and less length of contact with liquid provides better results. Contact of semen with equipment may allow for residual liquid accumulation on the luminal surfaces and a decrease in overall semen dose. Extenders with differing amounts of egg yolk did not influence volume of liquid dispensed.

Key words:  frozen , semen , pipette , insemination , extender

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Refereed

PII: S0737-0806(06)00299-1

doi:10.1016/j.jevs.2006.05.002

Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
Volume 26, Issue 7 , Pages 305-309, July 2006