Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
Volume 26, Issue 5 , Pages 215-218, May 2006

Effect of cooling rate and cryoprotectant on the cryosurvival of equine spermatozoa

Department of Biomedical Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO

Summary 

Cryosurvival of cells is reduced if the cooling rate used is suboptimal. If cells cool too rapidly, intracellular water will freeze, causing intracellular ice crystals. However, if spermatozoa are cooled too slowly, excessive cellular dehydration occurs, causing irreversible damage to cellular compartments. In addition, cryoprotectants are added to the freezing diluent to protect cells from damage during cryopreservation. This study was conducted to determine the optimal cooling rate for stallion spermatozoa frozen in the presence of three different cryoprotectants. Spermatozoa were frozen in a skim milk, egg yolk diluent containing 4% glycerol, and ethylene glycol or dimethyl formamide at 10 different cooling rates ranging from 5°C/min to 50°C/min. The percentage of viable spermatozoa was higher for spermatozoa cooled at 10°C/min than at 50°C/min (P < .05). Spermatozoa frozen using glycerol as the cryoprotectant had higher percentages of motile and progressively motile spermatozoa compared with spermatozoa frozen using the other two cryoprotectants (P < .05). In conclusion, the cryosurvival of stallion spermatozoa is similar when cooling rates of 5°C/min to 45°C/min are used, and when 4% cryoprotectant is used, glycerol is a more effective cryoprotectant than ethylene glycol or dimethyl formamide.

Key words:  cryopreservation , equine , spermatozoa , cooling rate

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 15.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0737-0806(06)00165-1

doi:10.1016/j.jevs.2006.03.003

Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
Volume 26, Issue 5 , Pages 215-218, May 2006