Scientific Paper
Lying behavior in horses in relation to box size

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jevs.2005.11.015Get rights and content

Abstract

To analyze if horses' lying behavior is influenced by the size of their lying area, 8 horses were kept, first, in a large box—(2.5 × height of the horse)2m2—and then in a small box—(1.5 × height of the horse)2m2—or vice versa. After a 5-day adaptation period, the lying behavior (frequency and duration of sternal and lateral recumbency, rotating behavior just before lying down, and rolling behavior just before getting up) was observed from video recordings on 3 consecutive nights. The results showed that the duration of sternal recumbency was significantly longer in the large boxes than in the small boxes (P = .002). Furthermore, box size exerted an influence on the frequency of the rolling behavior shown before getting up, but box size was not the only factor affecting this behavior. We conclude that observations of the resting behavior of horses are necessary to make recommendations for the minimal size of stalls for horses.

Introduction

In contrast with other farm animals, horses are often housed in old buildings. In addition, the size of modern riding horses is increasing. As a result, the size of the boxes in which most horses are kept is relatively small. According to Danish recommendations, the box area measured in m2 should be at least twice the height at the withers squared, and the shortest side of the box should be at least 1.5 times the height at the withers. Recommendations in other European countries are similar. In the UK, the British Horse Society recommends a box size of 3.6 × 3.6 m. In Sweden, the Swedish Board of Agriculture recommends that the minimum area for a small horse should be 8.0 m2, the shortest side being 2.35 m, and for a large horse 9.0 m2, the shortest side being 2.5 m. For horses higher than 1.7 m at the withers, the area in m2 should be at least 1.8 times the height at the withers squared. However, all of these recommendations are based on practical experience rather than systematic observation of the behavior of horses, particularly their lying behavior.

Pedersen et al1 conducted an experiment on the influence of bedding material on the time horses spend recumbent. The experiment revealed that most of the horses made a rolling behavior before getting up. It was suggested that this behavior is due to difficulties in getting up, possibly because of too small a box size. Except for a brief note in Waring,2 this rolling behavior before getting up has, to our knowledge, not been previously described. Therefore, the question is raised whether the behavior is normal or whether it is a result of too small a box size. If so, the behavior could possibly be used as an indicator of how big a box should be to allow normal resting behavior in horses. In addition, the rolling behavior increases the risk that the horse gets stuck against the box wall, a condition that is rare but can be fatal.

The number of studies on equine sleep is limited. The main focus has been on the entity of sleep and its effect on the behavior of the horse or on the effect of the behavior of the horse on its sleep.3 Although many studies have examined sleep in animals, its purpose is still unclear. Some studies suggest that sleep might serve as a thermoregulatory function,4, 5 that it plays a role in memory consolidation,6, 7, 8 permits vigilance recovery,9 conserves energy,4, 10 and is a restorative process.10 These studies also show that short-term deprivation of sleep will lead to an increase in total sleep time during recovery.

These and other studies make it obvious that systematic observations are necessary to ensure that horses are able to perform normal sleeping behavior, and to obtain an optimal amount of sleep, when reconsidering the recommendations for the minimal box size for horses.

The objective of the study was to analyze the effect of the box size on the lying behavior of horses and to observe whether the frequency of the rolling behavior before getting up is influenced by the size of the box. Based on video recordings, the duration and frequency of sternal and lateral recumbency of 8 horses kept both in a small and in a large box were calculated and the behavior before lying down and getting up was observed. Since determination of sleep necessitates electroencephalographic recording, particularly determination of slow wave sleep and rapid eye movement sleep (REM), observations in the current study were limited to body position rather than the occurrence of sleep.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

The study was done at Søborggaard Horse Centre in the northern part of Sealand (Denmark) from October 2003 to February 2004.

Statistics

For the statistical analysis, SAS was used. Because the data set was not normally distributed, it was transformed to normality with a Box-Cox transformation, with γ = 0.3 for the statistical analysis. The statistical program Proc Mixed was used for analysis with this model. To test for correlations between the occurrence of the rolling behavior and the horses' height at the withers, girth, and abdomen, a Spearman rank correlation test was done.

Lying behavior

The mean total duration of recumbency of each horse per night was 140 minutes in the large box and 135 minutes in the small box (Fig 1). When the estimated average duration of lying episodes was analyzed (ie, after transformation of the data set), there was a significant difference between the large box and the small box (P = .002; Table 2), in that the horses spent more time recumbent in a large box. When lying was divided into sternal and lateral recumbency, it was found that the horses spent

Discussion

The results of our study show that horses are recumbent for a longer time in the large boxes than in the small ones. Although the difference is small, it was found to be statistically significant (P = .002; Table 2). Furthermore, box size exerts an influence on the rolling behavior shown before getting up. When examining the treatment (ie, from small to large box or vice versa), it was revealed that the horses that are moved from a large to a small box perform the rolling behavior almost 3

Conclusion

We conclude that box size affected the lying behavior of horses in that they spent more time recumbent in a large box than in a small one. Although the difference was statistically significant, it was found to be so small that it is questionable whether it has any implications for the horse. We further conclude that box size was a factor that affected the occurrence of the rolling behavior before getting up and that the change was more pronounced in horses that went from a large box to a small

References (28)

Cited by (43)

  • The Behavior of Horses Stabled in a Large Group at Essential Resources (Watering Point and Lying Halls)

    2022, Journal of Equine Veterinary Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    Stabled horses also spend more time lying in the sternal than in the lateral position. Furthermore, the sternal position could be extended by increasing the size of single boxes [50]. Likewise, space allowance of the littered area affects lying behavior in group-housed horses [13].

  • Horses’ resting behaviour in shelters of varying size compared with single boxes

    2022, Applied Animal Behaviour Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    Full rolling prior to rising has been observed in horses on pasture (Hansen et al., 2007), indicating that a full roll may be a comfort behaviour when there is enough space. In this study, frequency of rolling prior to rising behaviour varied from 14% to 55%, compared with around 30% in other studies (Pedersen et al., 2004; Raabymagle and Ladewig, 2006; Hansen et al., 2007). How rising behaviour varies between housing systems and whether it is a potential indicator of welfare status need to be studied in more detail.

  • Stall architecture influences horses’ behaviour and the prevalence and type of stereotypies

    2019, Applied Animal Behaviour Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    Here we demonstrate that even when there is a small possibility for close social contact, this outdoor view is a source of more agitation and chronic stress-related behaviours (study 1) and that the effect is immediate (study 2). This is especially remarkable in the broodmare population where this was the only difference between the two types of stalls: mares that had grids on the half door performed less stereotypic behaviours and spent more time foraging and resting, the latter behaviours known to occur more in calm and positive situations (Benhajali et al., 2009; Greening et al., 2013; Kwiatkowska-Stenzel et al., 2016; Greening et al., 2013; Pessoa et al., 2016; Raabygmale and Ladewig, 2005) than those who could have the head outside and watch out-of-reach conspecifics and humans walking around. Another remarkable result is that the type of stereotypic behaviours performed varied according to stall architecture.

  • Assessing equine emotional state

    2018, Applied Animal Behaviour Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    This phenomenon of Post Inhibitory Rebound behaviour has been reported in horses post-confinement by both Freire et al. (2009) and Chaplin and Gretgrix (2010). The occurrence of Rebound behaviour has been shown to be subject to moderation through management activities such as the provision of social contact and stable size (Raabmagle and Ladewig 2006), but worryingly has also been shown to have serious impacts on horse welfare and human safety (e.g. Pessoa et al., 2016). The emotional mediation in rebound behaviour was highlighted by McGreevy and Nicol (1998) in their investigation of the motivational consequences of short-term prevention of crib-biting.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Refereed

View full text